I’ll admit that I’m often dismissive of information, especially in the field of emergency management and homeland security, if it’s over 10 years old. There is a lot that’s changed in the past 10 years, after all. But, realistically, for as much as we’ve changed, things have stayed the same. Arguably, the first decade of this millennium saw much more change in EM/HS than the second decade has, at least so far. The first decade saw events like 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina. Yes, there certainly have been major events in this second decade, but none, it seems, were as influential to our field of practice than those in the first decade.
It’s important to reflect upon lessons observed and to examine what lessons we’ve actually learned. How far have we come in implementing improvements from the 9/11 Report? What still needs to be accomplished to meet the intent of the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act (PKEMRA)? Perhaps when I have some time to devote I’ll review those documents again and look on them reflectively and provide my thoughts here.
Yesterday I received the latest email from DomesticPreparedness.com. I refer often to their work in my articles. This weekly brief included an article from one of my favorite authors in this field, John Morton. I’ve referenced his work in a few of my past articles. This article, titled The What If Possibility: A Chilling Report, talks about planning for a rogue nuclear attack, the likely lead role the federal government would have to take in response to such an attack (versus a locally-led response), and what the situation would be the day after. With the threat of North Korean nuclear weapons capability looming, this article was an interesting read and spot-on. I noticed a problem, though… It referenced Ash Carter as an assistant secretary of defense in the Clinton administration. While this was true, Carter’s highest office was SecDef under President Obama. Surely John Morton, with his incredible attention to detail that I’ve come to recognize couldn’t have made this error.
Nope. No error on his part. I looked at the date of the article. June 27, 2007 – over a decade old. Incredibly, this article is still highly relevant today. The article does reference the drafting of certain federal plans for nuclear attack. Plans which I am not privy to, but that must assuredly exist today. I’m curious as to the model these plans follow, what has been learned from exercising them, and how we might be able to apply elements of these plans to other catastrophic occurrences.
Despite change, so much seems to stay the same. Of course a decade isn’t that long. Given that emergency management and homeland security are primarily government roles, we have to acknowledge that the (usually necessary) bureaucracy simply doesn’t move that quickly. Unfortunately, there are things we are far too slow to adopt, not just from a government perspective, but socially. As a lover of history and sociology, I see lessons observed from the 1900 Galveston hurricane as well as the eruption of Mt Vesuvius in 79 CE. There is much that history can teach us, if we are willing to listen. Lessons observed, but not learned.
© 2017 – Timothy Riecker