There has been a lot of discussion lately on rethinking how we categorize hurricanes. At present, we use the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale, which provides a category (numbered 1-5) based on the hurricane’s present sustained wind speed. While this scale has served as the standard for several decades, it is based only upon one impact of hurricanes – wind. As such, the Saffir-Simpson scale is not a good universal predictor of potential hurricane impacts.
To better consider how we can categorize hurricanes, we should understand those impacts.
- Wind is an ever-present threat from hurricanes. The highest reaches of these winds can be utterly devastating, practically leveling an area of built infrastructure and foliage. Wind speeds can be measured throughout the entire life of the hurricane, and wind speeds can be predicted with reasonable accuracy. While tornadoes are generally expected with hurricanes, their intensity is difficult to predict.
- Storm Surge is the greatest threat to coastal areas from a hurricane. Storm surge is defined as the rising of the sea as a result of atmospheric pressure changes and wind associated with a storm. Essentially, the winds of the hurricane push water up on to land creating sudden inundation. The height and degree of inundation of storm surge is dependent upon several factors including wind speed, tide, natural and built barriers, and distance inland.
- Rain, like wind, is a sustained threat from hurricanes, potentially causing flooding well inland. The geographic size of hurricanes tends to result in saturation from rain across a wide area, making the management of runoff incredibly difficult. In coastal areas, rain will obviously contribute to the flooding conditions caused by storm surge.
In recognition of the hazards, there have been proposals for categorizing hurricanes based upon hazards other than wind. While I’m no meteorologist, I can certain identify that these will provide even less valuable data than wind alone. While it’s true that storm surge is often the most impactful hazard of hurricanes, the extent of potential damage from storm surge varies so wildly based upon a variety of factors, there are few general statements that can be made about it to establish any kind of categorization. Further, how will the storm threat be categorized to those too far inland to be impacted by storm surge? Rating a hurricane based upon rain is even less of a full picture than those who argue against wind.
The Saffir-Simpson scale begins to approach the problem by also defining the types of damage that can be caused by hurricanes of different intensities. These defined impacts, however, are limited to wind damages. Certainly the ideal model provides categories which define expected levels of damage from wind, rain, and storm surge combined. Such models may be more informative to the public, elected officials, first responders, and emergency managers. There are efforts under way to examine some potential new models. Be alert to what gets proposed and be sure to provide feedback.
Have I missed anything here? Are there any other considerations for how we should be categorizing hurricanes?
Timothy Riecker, CEDP
Emergency Preparedness Solutions, LLC℠
I think you covered it… Based on the very low number of DIRECT deaths from Florence – it appears the messaging of using the SS scale but also using storm surge products and rain/flood products worked well. There’s no reason to fix something not broken…
Thanks Rob. It certainly seems that people want better results, but I think one big issue is getting people to pay attention to the data that is out there.
Yup. There are a lot of good-intentioned ideas, but operationally it just won’t fly. Some suggested separate scales, but a “Wind Cat 3, Surge Cat1, Flood Cat 4, Tornado Cat 4” graphic won’t work 🙂 And if you average those in my example and come up with a “Storm Level 3” then the storm surge people expecting a big one will be messed up because it’s only going to be a 1…
Exactly. And it’s just too damn confusing to the general public, much less professionals.